Rafe Arnott/KTW
Citizen’s Assembly member Ray Jones talked to Kamloops This Week and answered some questions about the Single Transferable Vote; what it means for women, will ridings be too large and is it all just too complicated?
Q: How will STV increase the number of female candidates?
“Because parties are allowed to present more candidates to the public. It allows more flexibility. Given that is a priority on the parties’ part; the suspicion is there is no commitment from the parties’ too put forward women candidates. Then they blame the electoral system that there are not more.”
Q: Will ridings be too large for effective representation?
“I don’t think so. They (ridings) will still be smaller than federal ridings. The assembly struggled with the problem of riding size – it was a big issue. But people live where they live. Unless somebody wants to force people to move somewhere else. All 79 MLAs are elected from a geographical area – they’re not a party list name. With multi-members, if you don’t get satisfaction from one (MLA) you can go to another one.”
Q: Is the counting system too complicated for ordinary people to understand – is it accountable?
“No. That’s something I find annoying. There are lot of things in life which are complicated – but we use them. In a sense you could take comments like that (about complexity) as insulting – are we too stupid to figure it out? Voters must remember, they can choose only one candidate, or up to seven. That shouldn’t be an issue. As for accountability, they can print out how the votes were transferred from one to another. If people are worried about accountability they should be asking the same question about the present system.”
Q: When counting ballots in a four-member riding, where the quota is 25 per cent (for a winning candidate), are the second preferences for these votes counted?
“All the number-one choices are sorted according to candidate, then totaled up to calculate the quota. If any one candidate has more than their quota ( 25 per cent in a four member riding) then the transfer value is applied. For example if one candidate has 120 per cent of the votes needed to win, they mathematically shrink the 120 to the 100 (per cent), and that 20 per cent is shared, depending on the number two choice – but only on the over-quota candidates ballots.”